European leaders facing a Greenland-related conflict with Washington could use U.S. debt as leverage.
If that happens, not only the headline size of foreign stocks but also the absorption capacity of the market will be tested. speedand how quickly rising yields will be reflected in the dollar, US credit conditions, and cryptocurrency liquidity.
The Financial Times cast Greenland as a plausible flashpoint for tensions between the United States and Europe, and argued that U.S. Treasuries could be added to the menu of countermeasures.
This framework focuses on the mechanics and timing of implementation, rather than a single headline: “EU sells X.”
According to the U.S. Treasury’s Treasury International Capital (TIC) Table 5, foreign investors held $9.355 trillion in U.S. Treasuries as of the end of November 2025.
Of this, $3.922 trillion is held by foreign officials, which is large enough that even partial portfolio changes, especially if adjusted or swift, can be reflected in interest rates.
The first constraint is measurement.
TIC’s country line tracks securities reported by U.S.-based custodians and broker-dealers, and the Treasury Department notes that holdings in foreign custodial accounts “may not be attributable to the actual owner.”
This means the table “may not accurately calculate national ownership rights”, a warning that complicates claims that the “EU” can dump prescribed amounts on command.
Some European beneficial ownership may appear in non-EU countries, and European custodial hubs can hold the treasury of non-European owners. The practical implication is that “distribution capacity” is not the same as “European attributable holdings” and that policymakers have clearer influence over official portfolios than over private custodial flows.
A defensible reference set exists within the TIC data if it is described as a controller attribution rather than EU ownership.
As of the end of November 2025, the national debt belonging to Belgium ($481 billion), Luxembourg ($425.6 billion), France ($376.1 billion), Ireland ($340.3 billion), and Germany ($109.8 billion) totaled approximately $1,733 billion.
Properly presented, this $1.73 trillion figure is a high-end reference value for the main EU reporting and custody jurisdictions identified and not the sum of the verified EU-27 beneficiaries.
Stored data and “EU ownership” and why it matters
While “official” refers to classification in TIC reporting, the public sector position adds an additional layer because Fed custody data accounts for a location-based subset of where it is stored. in custody At the Federal Reserve Bank.
According to the Federal Reserve’s International Overview Data, foreign official U.S. Treasuries held at Federal Reserve Banks amounted to $2,745.89 billion (preliminary) as of November 2025.
This location-based subset is less than the $3.922 trillion total for TIC “foreign officials” at the end of November.
How the Greenland dispute turns into a sell-off will likely occur through a series of policy signaling and portfolio mechanisms rather than a single announcement of forced liquidation.
As the preconditioning phase unfolds over weeks and months, rhetoric may harden and European policymakers discuss monetary measures from a risk management perspective, consistent with the Financial Times’ framework that US Treasuries could act as leverage.
The second phase will last from days to weeks and will focus on policy signals such as concerted calls to shorten time horizons, reduce risks, and adjust reserves management guidelines.
These measures can be carried out without formal recognition of the move as weaponization and without the need for a central “EU” divestiture order.
The execution phase then determines the market impact and uses two potentially overlapping channels.
One is formal non-reinvested outflows at maturity, which can occur over a quarter or several years.
The other is active sales in the secondary market by public and private holders, which can be compressed into weeks if hedging constraints, risk limits, or volatility targets are binding.
Even if the political intention is gradual diversification, volatility can turn into a de facto flow shock if private hedgers and leveraged Treasury holders simultaneously avoid risk.
The clearing schedule is important because research shows that monthly changes in foreign official flows are associated with interest rate movements.
A 2012 Federal Reserve International Financial Discussion Paper study estimated that if foreign officials’ inflows into the Treasury were reduced by $100 billion in one month, five-year Treasury rates would rise by about 40 to 60 basis points in the short term.
It also estimated that the long-term impact would be close to 20 basis points, given the response from private investors.
Due to the age of this paper, this number serves as an order-of-magnitude threshold for speed risk rather than a point estimate of today’s market structure.
Still, the core implications remain. That is, a faster “dump” (or faster stop on a marginal buy) will have a different rate profile than an expiration outflow.
important: The table below shows the configuration of an editing scenario with an execution speed lens. Sales sizes are illustrative, with the exception of the $1.73 trillion line, which is a reference of TIC repository attribution to the primary EU reporting and custody jurisdiction and not an explicitly verified EU beneficiary amount. The expression of interest rates is structured as regime risk (orderly vs. disorderly) rather than a linear “bps per $X” extrapolation.
| Scenario (sales amount) | 1 month execution (flow shock framing) | 1/4 execution (absorption quota) | 1-3 years (outflow frame) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250 billion dollars | Heuristic short-term rates increase by 100 to 150 bps on five-year rates when concentrated in one month. The long-term effect after private responses approaches +50bps (2012 elasticity) | Diversification results in lower peak values due to hedging and repricing according to risk appetite | Often similar to a reduction in reinvestment, changes in term premiums exceed one-time shocks |
| 500 billion dollars | Heuristic short-term +200 to 300 bps. The long-term effect approaches +100 bps (2012 elasticity) | If maintained in parallel with the broader “America sell” trend, the possibility of another price reduction in term insurance premiums increases. | Acts as a diversifier and spreads market impact across the cycle |
| 1.0 trillion dollars | Tail risk short run +400 to 600 bps. The long-term effect approaches +200 bps (2012 elasticity) | Even if there is time to adjust, it could test dealers’ balance sheets and risk-bearing capacity. | Difficult to distinguish from structural reallocation without clearer attribution data |
| $1.73 trillion (see TIC custody attribution) | Tail risk framing if $1.73 trillion is treated as a one-off sale, keeping in mind that it is not EU beneficial ownership | If sales coincide with increased hedging demand, it could spill over into a tightening impulse over multiple quarters. | Similar to multi-year reserves and portfolio shifts when done primarily through outflows |
Execution speed, yield shock risk, and wider market spread
A sustained back-up in yields would hurt the heavily indebted US economy.
As of this writing, the total national debt of the United States is $38.6 trillion.
This size increases sensitivity to changes in marginal financing costs, even if refinancing occurs over time.
Rising government bond yields typically tighten financial conditions through benchmarking effects on mortgages, investment grade issuance, and leveraged credit.
The valuation of stocks may also be revalued in response to changes in the risk-free discount rate, and the channel becomes more severe if not only the policy path but also the price of the term premium is revalued.
The ripple effects are broader than for U.S. Treasuries because foreign investors have greater influence over the U.S. market overall.
The Treasury Department’s annual survey reports that foreign holdings of U.S. securities are $31.288 trillion, of which $12.982 trillion is long-term debt and $16.988 trillion is equity.
In the crypto-adjacent market, stablecoin issuers are also important buyers of the Treasury. look crypto slate Breakdown of Treasury demand for stablecoin issuers.
The outcome of the dollar is divided into two regimes that can coexist across horizons.
Under severe stress, geopolitical shocks can drive investors toward dollar liquidity and U.S. collateral even if a single block is sold, resulting in a situation where yields rise while the dollar holds or strengthens.
In the long run, sustained politicization could take a different direction if allies treat the U.S. government press as a policy variable, encourage gradual diversification of public portfolios, and gradually weaken structural demand for dollars.
According to the International Monetary Fund’s COFER data, the dollar accounted for 56.92% of the world’s disclosed foreign exchange reserves in the third quarter of 2025, while the euro accounted for 20.33%.
Its structure tends to change in stages rather than all at once.
The IMF also said that movements in previous quarters had at times been driven by valuations, noting that the decline in dollar share in the second quarter of 2025 was “primarily driven by valuations” due to exchange rate effects.
This dynamic can obscure the interpretation of quarter-to-quarter changes when volatility increases.
Cryptocurrency transmission: liquidity, discount rates, and narrative reflexivity
In the case of the crypto market, short-term correlation will be achieved not only through reserve stocks, but also through interest rates and dollar liquidity.
Treasury’s quick liquidation raising intermediate yields could raise global discount rates and tighten leverage conditions affecting BTC and ETH positioning.
Slower outflows will have more spillover effects through term premium drifts and portfolio rebalancing across equities and credit.
The narrative channel could go in a different direction.
High-profile episodes in which allies discuss government bonds as a policy tool could strengthen the “neutral settlement” framework that some in the market apply to cryptocurrencies, even if the primary action is to reduce risk in the face of high yields.
Tokenized Treasury products sit at the intersection of TradFi collateral and crypto rails. See igcurrencynews’s coverage as tokenized U.S. Treasuries hit an all-time high of $7.45 billion.
Traders and policymakers aren’t looking at a single headline: “EU sells X.” This is because data in custody bases can misrepresent beneficial ownership.
Instead, it will likely track a series of observable indicators, such as changes in foreign public protection holdings at the Fed and changes in total TIC reporting over subsequent months.
If Greenland triggers sustained fiscal brinkmanship in the US and EU, the first important market variable will be whether Treasury cuts are implemented as a one-month flow shock or as a multi-year outflow.
(Tag translation) Bitcoin
