The Ethereum Foundation is causing a rift in the community with the recently released EF Directive document. This document outlines the future of Ethereum, but is controversial throughout its language and concepts.
The Ethereum Foundation has been vocal about its active involvement in the future of Ethereum. Recently, the Foundation began tracking progress towards the creation of Ethereum. quantum resistance.
The foundation has also set out to make Ethereum the backbone of on-chain finance, with an ambitious goal of managing $1 trillion in assets. Other objectives related to privacy, self-sovereignty, and security are controversial.
Ethereum Foundation members demand they sign a document or be fired
All members of the Ethereum Foundation were asked to sign a mandate document or face immediate termination. This has led to discussions about how the overwhelming pressure for coordination and consensus poses a potential disadvantage to building an actual Ethereum upgrade.
Although the document focuses on a variety of points, it leans toward resistance to censorship as a core value.
“Resistance to censorship: No adversary can selectively eliminate useful use or destroy functionality, including by gaining permanent, non-competitive control of critical mechanisms. ” states the power of attorney.
The Ethereum Foundation supports unstoppable work without central intermediaries or kill switches. This approach may conflict with current practice, which has made decisions such as: freeze It supports some assets and provides at least some control if they carry significant value within the protocol.
Mandate document creates rift between Milady community and Go Ethereum
Part of the controversy over the Ethereum Foundation’s authority stems from conflicts between the Milady community and Go Ethereum.
Milady is known for her social media $NFT Collect collections as their avatars and rally around your unique vision for Ethereum. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin is also a self-proclaimed Milady, demonstrating his loyalty to online communities. Milady $NFT The owner is one of the main proponents of adding little esoteric language to Ethereum’s purpose and development.
At the same time, one of the major Ethereum node clientadvocated a more pragmatic approach to running networks.
(x) milady’s core product is a LARP aimed at cult growth and is completely introverted. The entire tradition is self-referential, and there is a huge gap between self-importance and actual influence. Philosophy hasn’t come very far (..) https://t.co/RyBUX7BULZ
— ً (@lightclients) March 25, 2026
The recent EF mandate document further intensified the conflict between the Go Ethereum and Milady communities.
This rift reveals that Milady prefers to use the Foundation as a vehicle for cypherpunk ideas. These ideas opposed attempts to use Ethereum for economic value and reliable products.
The Milady controversy is relatively unknown to Ethereum users, who see the Ethereum chain as a decentralized computer suitable for financial operations. For some, the image of Milady EF obligations is concerned and sends messages beyond the text point. For some, the recent EF mandate is ‘ideological chatter”, and even $NFT And styling that attempts to build a “fun” social media culture can be damaging to your brand.
The impact of the Milady fraction is significant for Ethereum, and the community is still responsible for disbursing the remainder of the significant Ethereum Foundation funds. Milady $NFT The owner also launched Miledi Cult Coin (cult), which is now down 97% from its peak.
Current social media discussions may signal a deepening rift in Ethereum, which could pose problems for future development. The Ethereum Foundation has also been accused of overspending and overselling. $ETHrecently agreed to stake some of their coins. Nevertheless, the Foundation deployed an additional 20,000 people. $ETH What remained in February 209K $ETH.
Ethereum may be promising, but the Ethereum Foundation’s approach could turn into a cult-like expression and be closely monitored for swaying future development decisions.
