James O’Byrne (Jamesob) has warned that Bitcoin has suffered a technical stagnation since 2021, prioritizing price over protocol innovation.
On January 10, developer James O’Byrne (Jamesob) sounded the alarm on the ecosystem, stating that Bitcoin is experiencing a period of “significant stagnation.” Experts say that while technological progress in the underlying protocols has stalled, networks are living off revenues from past economic milestones.
For O’Byrne, the situation is clear from the public debate. After years of building to milestones like ETFs, institutional adoption, and corporate Treasury stakes, price momentum appears to have run out. Leaving a gap in deep technological evolution.
The developers point out that this is not the case Significant improvements since Taproot activation in 2021. This update is designed to facilitate more complex functionality, but a lack of cohesiveness in the technical community prevents these tools from being fully utilized.
This paralysis can worry experts. History shows that Bitcoin is slow to change. More than four years have passed between SegWit (2017) and Taproot (2021).. However, it took an average of two and a half years from proposing an improvement plan to implementing it. However, today there seems to be no clear consensus on what the next important step will be, although all indications are that it will be on the quantum side.
The quantum threat: a race against time
One of the biggest risks of this technological lethargy is vulnerability to quantum computing. While base development has stalled, advances in quantum computers could compromise the network before Bitcoin is ready.
Currently, it is estimated that: 33% of all Bitcoins in circulation are Vulnerable to quantum attacks. This is because the public key is stored in an old address format that is public (such as P2PK or P2PKH), and a quantum computer can derive the private key.
Implementing signatures that are resistant to quantum computing is a very difficult task. Preventing large parts of supply from being stolen in the future requires not only technical agreement but also rapid implementation.
Despite the pessimism about stagnation, experimental efforts are already underway to reduce this risk. recently released quantum secured bitcoin testnetAs reported by CriptoNoticias, it is designed to test post-quantum signatures without risking real funds. This progress is critical because it shows that the technology exists, but its integration into major networks continues to be hampered by techno-bureaucracy.
Experts note that post-quantum protection should be an immediate priority. In addition to the lack of “technical consistency” that O’Byrne blames, the increased latency negatively impacts the network. If Bitcoin’s own update capabilities do not accelerate, it could be exposed to significant security obsolescence.
From SegWit to Taproot: A timeline of waits
Bitcoin conservatism That’s our biggest strength, but also our main brake. The four year gap between the last major update shows how difficult it is to change the basic protocol.
Last cycle, we had a clearer roadmap. Currently, the panorama is fragmented. suggestions like pledge (More advanced smart contracts) remain in limbo with no clear path to implementation, reinforcing Jamesov’s theory of lack of direction.
James O’Byrne claims Bitcoin will “burn out” its best story in 2025. By focusing only on market value, You risk neglecting the infrastructure that will maintain its value over time.
In conclusion, Jamesob’s message is a call to action. Without continued technological evolution and mechanisms to resolve disagreements, Bitcoin risks becoming a static asset in the face of unstoppable technological challenges such as quantum computing.
