The short-term price correction turned into a broader test of market confidence in one of crypto’s biggest assets, as Ethereum prices fell towards $2,100.
data from crypto slate ETH has fallen nearly 10% over the past week, wiping out May’s gains and showing that traders’ focus is back on the $2,000 level.
This price performance came as selling pressure spread across spot markets, derivatives and regulated investment products.
This weakness has left Ethereum’s price caught between two competing forces. In the short term, rising oil prices, foreign currency inflows, aggressive futures selling, and ETF redemptions are weighing on the token.
Proponents, including Bitmain chairman Tom Lee, argue that in the long term, Ethereum’s role in tokenization and agent-based artificial intelligence will remain intact, with a clearer disconnect between current price trends and the asset’s structural investment case.
How oil pressure affects Ethereum price
Lee placed the initial part of Ethereum’s price decline outside of the cryptocurrency itself, arguing that oil is the biggest macro headwind for Ethereum.
The BitMine chairman said rising oil prices are the biggest source of pressure on Ethereum, pointing to what he called a record inverse correlation between ETH and oil.
For traders, Ethereum Crude correlation is important. This is because oil acts as a proxy for inflation, liquidity stress, and broader risk appetite.
In this situation, the rise in oil prices has coincided with the fall in Ethereum, making the energy market an important part of the current crypto decline.
Oil prices have risen more than 54% since the US-Iran war began on February 28, pushing prices above $100, the highest level in years, according to data from Oilprice.com.
The move added further pressure to a market already sensitive to inflation, interest rates and liquidity expectations.
Rising oil prices can increase transportation, production and energy costs, acting as a tax on consumers and businesses. It could also complicate the central bank’s outlook by continuing to raise inflation risks.
For cryptoassets that are often traded as expressions of high-liquidity, high-beta risk appetite, this can cause demand to decline rapidly as traders begin to reduce their exposure.
Ethereum’s price has been particularly exposed to changes as the token entered May in recovery mode. Confidence started to recover with the move towards $2,400, but the overall slump in digital assets started again as oil prices rose.
However, as oil prices have risen over the past few weeks, ETH has steadily lost momentum and retreated towards the lower end of its recent range.
Still, Lee described oil-related pressures as “short-term tactical noise” and suggested they could ease if oil prices stall or reverse.
While this view focuses on oil as the immediate macro trigger, it also leaves room for Ethereum’s long-term case to be reasserted once the market moves beyond current inflation and liquidity concerns.
Binance flows and futures selling indicate pressure on market structure
While the macro backdrop determined the direction of Ethereum’s decline, on-chain and derivatives data shows how the pressure was transmitted to the market.
According to CryptoQuant data, Binance recorded continuous positive ETH netflow in the first half of May. This means that more ETH was deposited on the exchange than withdrawn.
This change is important because even if the deposits are not sold immediately, the inflow of foreign exchange increases the amount of liquidity available for trading.
This move was large enough to change the short-term balance of the market. More than 225,000 ETH moved to Binance in one day, and the exchange’s seven-day moving average of net flows reached its highest level since late 2022.
The timing amplified the signal as ETH was already losing momentum after trading around $2,400.
Transferring large amounts to exchanges may reflect several motivations. Some holders may be preparing to sell, some may be taking positions for hedging purposes, and others may be moving collateral for derivatives transactions.
However, in a declining market situation, a surge in deposits tends to raise concerns that buyers may become more cautious and more supply may enter the order book.
This helped explain why the decline in Ethereum price accelerated as ETH approached $2,100. This token no longer only addresses macro pressures from oil and interest rates. It was also absorbing new exchange supply from large holders, forcing the market to find a new level at which buyers could absorb additional liquidity.
The pressure then reached the futures market. According to CryptoQuant data, Binance takers sold over $1.1 billion in less than an hour over the weekend as ETH hovered around $2,100.
Taker sell volume tracks active market selling, where traders respond to existing bids rather than passively placing orders. A spike in this indicator during a decline often indicates forced risk aversion, stop-loss execution, or short-term traders leaning into downward momentum.
Ethereum ETF outflows further weigh on prices as institutional investor demand weakens
With continued outflows from regulated investment products, it has become difficult to dismiss Ethereum’s decline as a short-term currency-driven movement.
The US-based Spot Ethereum ETF recorded net outflows for the sixth consecutive trading day, shedding more than $340 million, according to data from SoSoValue.
This redemption coincided with the decline in ETH, suggesting that demand for the ETF was not strong enough to absorb pressure from spot sellers and derivatives traders.
Meanwhile, setbacks also appeared in global trends. Ethereum investment products recorded weekly outflows of $249 million in the period ending May 15, the largest single weekly outflow since January 30, according to data from CoinShares.
These withdrawals extend the weakness beyond Binance and leveraged futures traders.
ETF flows are closely monitored as they can provide a clearer read on the appetite of regulated investors. As ETFs raise capital, they can support the market by absorbing supply and reinforcing confidence. Losing capital during price declines can lead to increased reliance on spot buyers and short-term traders to stabilize prices.
This is the challenge currently facing Ethereum price, as the token faces pressure from multiple channels at once. Crude oil weighed on macro sentiment. The influx of Binance has increased the supply of available exchanges. Futures selling pushed down this move. ETF redemptions eliminated a potential source of institutional support.
This overlap helps explain why ETH has struggled to defend its May gains. Each source of pressure led to the next, turning what started as a macro-sensitive rebound into a broader test of liquidity, positioning, and demand.
These signals need to improve together for recovery to appear more durable. Currency inflows will need to remain subdued, aggressive futures selling will need to wane, and ETF outflows will need to slow or reverse.
Absent that change, Ethereum’s long-term story is likely to remain intact while short-term markets continue to trade defensively.
Ethereum tokenization and AI shape the path to ETH price recovery
Lee argued that Ethereum’s current weaknesses should be separated from the long-term forces that could support the network until 2026.
While oil, currency inflows, futures selling, and ETF redemptions are shaping the short-term decline, Lee said the larger driver for ETH remains tokenization and agent-based AI.
These themes are central to the investment case for Ethereum, as both rely on programmable financial rails, abundant liquidity, and a payments infrastructure that can support activities beyond speculative trading.
Tokenization is a more developed part of that discussion. Financial institutions are increasingly using blockchain networks to represent assets such as government bonds, funds, credit products, and other securities on-chain. Ethereum continues to be one of the leading venues for that change due to its developer base, liquidity, security record, and established smart contract infrastructure.
According to Token Terminal data, the on-chain market value of real-world assets is over $38 billion, with Ethereum accounting for approximately 67% of tokenized RWA.
Grayscale also described tokenization as a huge potential investment opportunity, noting that despite rapid growth over the past year, tokenized assets still represent a small portion of global equity and bond markets.
This would give Ethereum a structural argument beyond its current decline. As more traditional assets move to public ledgers, networks that provide payments, liquidity, and smart contract execution are likely to take a larger share of financial activity.
Ethereum proponents argue that the Ethereum chain is already positioned to play that role, as it has the deepest DeFi ecosystem and one of the most mature foundations of tokenized asset infrastructure.
Lee’s second thrust, agent AI, adds a new layer to the same theory. Autonomous software systems that can trade, borrow, lend, verify data, and settle payments will require digital rails designed for machine-driven activities.
Ethereum proponents argue that the blockchain network is well-suited for the role because it allows agents to interact directly with code, liquidity pools, stablecoins, and on-chain credit markets.
These long-term factors underpin BitMine’s view that the recent decline has created an opportunity rather than weakening the broader theory.
The company views ETH’s decline below $2,200 as an attractive level to accumulate assets, citing continued tokenization and agent AI developments as reasons to look beyond the current market stress.
BitMine owns over 5.2 million ETH, making it the largest public company holder of digital assets. This position puts the company directly exposed to whether Ethereum’s structural demand story can weather current pressures from oil, currency supply, derivative sales, and ETF outflows.
However, the case for ETH price recovery still requires confirmation from the market. For investors to be able to treat the recent selloff with more confidence as a reset, ETH inflows will need to subside, futures selling will need to fade, and ETF redemptions will need to slow. The reversal in oil prices would also confirm Lee’s view that the biggest macro resistance to ETH is temporary.
(Tag translation) Featured
